Note I don't disagree with any of his text as stated, I just don't believe it counters my side. "You can use melee weapons one size category larger than you are with a -2 penalty on the attack roll but the amount of effort it takes to use the weapon does not change." I counter that nowhere in the feat does it say specifically that there is any affect on weapons of your size, it just references weapons larger. For a Medium creature that has this feat, it is still considered a one-handed weapon.īasically saying that a two handed medium weapon and a large one handed weapon are the same and thus should be treated the same for purposes of this feat. For instance a Large longsword (a one-handed weapon for a Large creature) is considered a two-handed weapon for a Medium creature that does not have this feat. You can use melee weapons one size category larger than you are with a -2 penalty on the attack roll but the amount of effort it takes to use the weapon does not change. Conversely, a Large dagger (a light weapon for a Large creature) is considered a one-handed weapon for a Medium creature, or a two-handed weapon for a Small creature."Īs well as the feat itself (especially the bolded part): "For instance, a Small greatsword (a two-handed weapon for a Small creature) is considered a one-handed weapon for a Medium creature, or a light weapon for a Large creature. As typical in D&D a friend and I are having a debate, this time about whether or not Monkey Grip (3.5 complete warrior feat) allows a medium creature to wield a 2-handed medium weapon with one hand.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |